Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night Club (1989 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Night Club (1989 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability.

PROD removed with "Deprod, Corbucci’s last film", which isn't accurate. Women in Arms (film) is his last film. Donald D23  talk to me  01:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes and no. Women in Arms was released after his death. — MY OH MY ! 08:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Italy.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak delete I'm not seeing significant coverage in English but I don't read Italian and that is the language in which sources are most likely to WP:NEXIST hence "weak." Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Sources indeed exist. Very positive review in La Repubblica  here, for instance, or this page quoting reviews of the time, etc. This is a notable film by an an important director... —  MY OH MY ! 08:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. The article's creator clearly has no idea how Wikipedia works, but the film is notable. IMO the right move with these types of pages would be to draftify them. Cavarrone 19:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Found a full review by a national Italian newspaper. Keep in mind this is an archive of an independent review from 1990. Common sense tells me that if one example of significant coverage exists and can be found via Italian Google from 30 years ago. Along with the other hits I think the notability guideline is likely met and so keep is the most appropriate outcome. MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion such as reviews in La Repubblica newspaper and evidence of other reviews so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.