Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightbitch (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Nightbitch (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nightbitch (film)

Unreleased film that does not meet film notability or general notability. Originator moved it from draft space to article space with comment: "Filming has begun" and a source. There is a myth that a film becomes notable when principal photography begins. In fact, the film notability guideline is poorly written, and has been confusing for more than a decade, but it says that a film is not notable before filming has begun, and that an unreleased film in production is only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. There is nothing in this article that provides significant coverage of the production or release of the film. (It hasn't been released.) A review of the references shows that they are all the usual announcements made about an upcoming film, such as signing of the director and leading lady, and the distribution deal. All of the sources are primary. They are all reliable, but they are mostly reliably promotional.

The article should be moved back into draft space until the film is released, and a redirect should be made to Marielle Heller. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify. Fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Films get scrapped in development all the time. WP:TOOSOON applies.4meter4 (talk) 03:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify Fails WP:NFF Donald D23   talk to me  14:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: This could also redirect with history to the book page so that when coverage becomes available, it can be restored. This looks like it's really just a case of needing that last big push - which will likely end up coming about in the form of reviews. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  20:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.