Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightcore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  08:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Nightcore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability, poor/weak sources, heavy dependence on weak primary sources, unusable primaries cited for key information, all in all, not worth keeping. Acousmana (talk) 09:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Granted the article needs some work, but IMO there are reliable sources which can be added to support the topic. For instance, see mentions in NME and The Guardian. --  S. Hinakawa  (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of reliable sources can be found surrounding this topic; see the Template:Find sources AFD at the top. You need to dig a fair bit to get past the nonsense, but here are some examples:


 * Orcaguy (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment How does it fail to meet notability? There are specific criteria, if the nominator or potential supporters could point to which criteria or even a single criterion they feel it fails, then discussion could be much better focused than it currently is. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 00:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.