Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightingales of Beccles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The nominator of the AFD and the keep !voter below are one in the same; that is, they are both ✅ socks of. Taking those socks away, there leave no consensus for deletion. There is no prejudice from renomination by a good faith user, however. –MuZemike 02:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Nightingales of Beccles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete Nightingales is a small company and after the cuts it will loss nearly all it's routes. There is no need for a Wikipedia page about a local bus company. 21:01, 13 March 2011 Highhousefarm1.
 * Fixed nom. Please close seven days after 11:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This page has lots of brilliant info and the deleter failed to say what rules it broke to be deleted. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no more evidence of notability than any of the other bus company articles nominated by Highhousefarm1. Pardon me, but I don't see any brilliant info on this page: all I see is unreferenced statememnts, writing in the second person, and informal bold formatting for no good reason.  Nyttend (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.