Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightlife demographic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 22:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Nightlife demographic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism? Only source is a marketing company. Durova 360 18:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (but...): The information in itself is not uninteresting and could probably find a home elsewhere on Wikipedia e.g. in an article on the leisure industry. But unless it can be shown that the term and concept are established (that is, more established than "the demographic of XYZ" where XYX is any activity you care to mention), it's not appropriate that it should have an article all of its own. Barnabypage (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete & Redirect to demographic profile or marketing research. ClubDistrict's analysis is by no means consistent across all possible markets. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The demographic of pretty much any market is bound to have been researched by a marketing firm at some point, so even if reliable sources can be found an article about each one would probably be an unnecessary fork. Additional factor is that article was created by SPA and the company mentioned (Clubdistrict) have had an article about themselves deleted per G11 so they have recently attempted to promote themselves through Wikipedia; if this article was written someone from Clubdistrict this is original research unless the source material has been published independently (can't tell as there's no link to the source and my Google search hasn't located one). Cassandra 73 (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cassandra 73, who basically said what I was going to say anyway (article created by a SPA presumably involved with the company mentioned, neologism, OR, and so forth). Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 00:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and delete Nightlife industry and move any worthwhile information to Nightlife which is at least a more mature article. Sussexonian (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.