Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightmares in Wax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirected to Dead or Alive (band). The info is already there so no need for a merge. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Nightmares in Wax

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable band fails, WP:N and WP:BAND and WP:MUSIC Troyster87 (talk) 03:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Strong Keep. Clearly notable. The band included Pete Burns for one thing, and there's a substantial Allmusic bio, as well as coverage in George Gimarc's Punk Diary book. There's plenty of scope for expansion, but it could and probably should be merged into Dead or Alive (band), which already seems to include the current content of this article.--Michig (talk) 08:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * merge or redirect to Dead or Alive (band). Artw (talk) 08:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note. I have gone ahead and edited Dead or Alive (band) in anticipation of a merge and redirect.--Michig (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dead or Alive (band). JamesBurns (talk) 02:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  fr33k  man   -s-  15:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge given that they evolved into Dead or Alive. Capitalistroadster (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - Notability established due to connection to Burns and Dead or Alive, but not nearly enough material there to warrant a whole article. No prejudice to promoting to standalone ref if someone can expand and source it. § FreeRangeFrog 21:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge - this band is notable for all reasons stated above. If some serious material can be found and sourced, then Keep, otherwise, into the Dead or Alive page is fine. - eo (talk) 11:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've gone ahead and redirected to Dead or Alive, since that article already contained the content of this one. Could someone close this discussion - it's pointless wasting any more time on it, and it's clear that merge and redirect is the consensus view. I'm not convinced this even needed to be relisted.--Michig (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.