Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Communications, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that notability is not established.-- Kubigula (talk) 22:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Nike Communications, Inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nomination for, apparently Twinkle messed up. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, they definitely have some name recognition and press over the years. What's online is probably just enough for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 00:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP and does not assert notability. -Drdisque (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep  to Delete unless articles can be found that establish the firm's notability. I found several company mentions in articles about clients or "Nike communications" people from the other Nike, but nothing yet overwhelming about a company that's been around 24 years. It probably doesn't help that there's some serious overlap of one-day/IP editors wreaking PR speak across the articles of companies listed as clients. Flowanda | Talk 06:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.