Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Tiempo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Nike football boots. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Nike Tiempo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 4 out of 5 references being unreliable. Footy-Boots.com, where 2 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The Instep, where one of the reference is from, is a blog. Unisportstore.com, where one of the reference is from lists the author as "anonymous" and is also a site which sells the products its reviewing which is a slight conflict of interest. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPathtalk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, please select an existing target article to Redirect to. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Football. TarnishedPathtalk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to a new article on Nike football boots or similar, which would be a notable general topic. GiantSnowman 10:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It is now an article again. Another user had boldly redirected. That redirect has been reverted. TarnishedPathtalk 09:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.