Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Mahajan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Merely asserting that someone is notable amounts to nothing without sources to back up the claim. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Nikhil Mahajan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page Looks like made for the purpose of Advertisement. UserPankajM (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 24.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep - He is well known person in Marathi film industry in my opinion. Thank you. -- Dr. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * KEEP :- Well known personality in marathi film industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4052:2115:C674:0:0:16D6:E0AD (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as he does not meet the Wikipedia criteria Notability_(people). There is no evidence, neither in the article nor presented by the users above that this actor is a notable actor. From my searching I could only find that this actor has done minor roles in a few movies. Which confirms my hunch that this is not a popular actor (or director). If he was one, then he would have got leading roles in the movies. It is quite possible that this article was created for promoting the actor or by his fan. Cedix (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewed the article again. The issue of lack of independent coverage in reliable media still remains. This is strange since users above claim that he is well known. Cedix (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.