Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikil Murugan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 20:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Nikil Murugan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just a man with a job (marketing). Notability unclear as most of the content of the article is irrelevant and promo. The Banner talk 22:52, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Earlier speedily removed under A7 under the title Nikkil and then recreated over the redirect. The Banner talk 01:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, for being a publicist dealing with and promoting notable others, is not in and of itself a particularly notable field. India Today may applaud his expertise by calling him the best public relations officer in South Indian cinema, but that is not itself a notable accolade. And the Filmibeat citation simply repeats that and shares more about his regular job as a P.R.O. Yes, he does get a lot written about him in multiple reliable sources, but his press coverage is entirely dependent upon what he has done for others as a job. The article is itself quite promotional and lacks neutrality. The A7 speedy was because it was thought the former article did not have a clear assertion of notability, but this one does include sourcing which makes such a claim. However, this AFD is best so as to have others offer input toward the reasonableness of the claim and whether or not it is a notability.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete- As per nomination and . — Cutest</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches "Nikil Murugan" at News, Books and browser found nothing particularly good and this would be a good case of WP:TNT. SwisterTwister   talk  18:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.