Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikita Gloydman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Nikita Gloydman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Semi-pro with no evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. Searches of "Никита Глойдман" in multiple search engines did not yield any significant coverage. Best source I can find is Tula Sport which is both local and trivial. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Russia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. This editor, despite being counseled that footballers need to pass GNG, continues to create these stubs about footballers who, even if WP:NFOOTY hadn't been deprecated, wouldn't meet even that low bar. Onel 5969  TT me 10:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article about non-notable semi-pro footballer which fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 17:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG Lightburst (talk) 00:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.