Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikita Pelizon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone  02:30, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Nikita Pelizon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are many sources for this BLP, however it is the quality of the ones that provide in-depth coverage that are the issue. Most of these are either gossip magazine stories or WP:ROUTINE coverage of reality-TV events. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Dance, Fashion,  and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Having looked at the first block of 14 references. Lots of PR, interviews, profiles and clickbait and not a single WP:SECONDARY source amongst the lot of them. They are all WP:PRIMARY, many of the puff pieces. Not an actress nor a television personality. Most of its generated from Big Brother.    scope_creep Talk  16:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked at the second block of references, promos, interviews, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  // Timothy :: talk  02:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find any WP:SIGCOV to show they meet pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 20:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.