Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikitha Grero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Nikitha Grero

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet notability criteria under WP:BIO. No inherent notability in being a "chief visionary officer" of a school or the son of a government minister. Obi2canibe (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Obi2canibe (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * KEEP, He has participated to several international conferences regarding school schemes. Also as a businessman, he owned the private bus property who is the only Sri Lankan supplier. Meanwhile, the interschool annual cricket tournament is also honored to him. That means, he is worth to have an article..(Gihan Jayaweera talk) 19:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ANYBIO, just because he attended some international conferences and owns a bus company does not make him notable. Dan arndt (talk) 01:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * KEEP, International School system in Sri Lanka is not a popular aspect. So to popularize this system, he did a great job. May be it is not a strikng factor for your country, but for my country it is a huge thing. He told me that, he will provide reliable newspaper sources ASAP. So, definitely fits to "Academics" content, rather than WP:ANYBIO. So, just consider. Do not think every time to DELETE.. My point it, IMPROVE.. (Gihan Jayaweera talk) 19:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You are only allowed one keep opinion per AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found this on a deletion list for university professors, for whom WP:PROF would be the better-fitting notability criterion, but based on the statements in the article and here he appears to have been primarily involved in pre-university levels of education, for which WP:GNG is the right criterion. Under that criterion, we need multiple reliably-published sources that are independent of the subject and each other, and that provide significant depth of coverage about the subject. I'm not seeing that — we have sources by the subject, gossipy tabloid sources about a marriage to a student that don't look reliable, sources that don't even mention the subject, sources about a book written by the subject's father, sources about the school where the subject works, and a youtube video review of a bus service that is not about the subject and doesn't look reliable. I don't see any of these that can contribute towards GNG notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * PS Gihan Jayaweera has been WP:CANVASSing on my talk: Special:Diff/1005025253. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable educator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG, WP:PROF, WP:TOOSOON, and WP:MILL. I am genuinely confused. There is no real allegation of notability here, and no evidence he's done anything notable. He appears to be a mid-level academic administrator with aside business. According to the page, he is 32 years old, at the beginning of his career. There are literally hundreds of thousands of academic officers and entrepreneurs around the world, and I can't for my life see how this person is more notable than the rest. Bearian (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Except for the "high school director marries student at his own high school" angle, you mean? In most places that would be a major scandal. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.