Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Nine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Nikki Nine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No reliably sourced biographical content, no actual assertion of notability. All GNews/GBooks hits are trivial or spurious. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:ENT. Monterey Bay (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - for all reasons cited BO ; talk 11:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not the subject of multiple substantial pieces in so-called reliable, independent sources. I also want to add my loathing of all pseudo-biographies which do not include actual names and actual biographic information. Failing to achieve that minimum reasonable expectation for a biographic piece renders this an example of fan cruft, in my estimation. This situation is endemic for porn bios — mainly because there is no substantial, reliable, independent sourcing available. Carrite (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is a bit of sourcing for a racehorse of the same name,  but nothing significant and reliable that I was able to find on the actress. --joe deckertalk to me 16:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability of any kind. No evidence of multiple on trivial coverage. Oxy20 (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delte fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. Closing admin - WP:PORNBIO is depreciated and should be ignored. Hipocrite (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.