Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Porikos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Niko Porikos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A promotional article about a collegiate hockey player who doesn't meet WP:NHOCKEY, who is now a social media marketing consultant. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:21, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

More specific guidelines overrule WP:GNG, right (per WP:IINFO?) Assuming so, Delete because he fails WP:NHOCKEY and is not notable for anything else. LittlePuppers (talk) 02:42, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * (my opinion, others may disagree) They can, in some circumstances. For example, the WP:MILL coverage of college hockey games such as  should be ignored for the purpose of GNG based on the subject-specific guidelines.  That said, not meeting an SNG isn't enough to delete an article, as an extreme case whether Arthur Conan Doyle meets WP:NCRIC is irrelevant.  power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 02:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks - although I'd say Arthur Conan Doyle would be judged by WP:AUTHOR :). LittlePuppers (talk) 03:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't think he is notable through either his entrepreneurial or his athletic profile (or their combination). Agricolae (talk) 01:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.