Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolas Badminton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Nikolas Badminton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable speaker. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/MrVanDigital with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete; trivial at this point; does not meet WP:GNG and Wikipedia is not a newspaper (WP:NOTNEWS). Kierzek (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Seems promising. Requires more work. Mgbo120 (talk) 11:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * delete No evidence of meeting any notability standards. Being a "futurist" and organizing your own events to speak at do not show the GNG is met.Sandals1 (talk) 15:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.