Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolaus Ritt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Nikolaus Ritt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As for other entries here for Stefan Dollinger, Herbert Schendl, Herbert Koziol, I'm proposing this other non-notable vanity academic page with primary sources written by a user with a clear conflict of interest. These articles should be considered collectively. Polyamorph (talk) 06:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  talk  07:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. WeAreAll Here  <sub style="color:blue">talk  07:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment See discussion here. Polyamorph (talk) 08:09, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cnilep (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Leaning delete. At least based on English-language sources, I'm not finding sufficient material to satisfy WP:PROF or WP:NBIO. There may be material in other languages, but his field English Historical Linguistics. Cnilep (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. sufficient publication to show ihe is an authority in hisspecialty of Middle English Phonetics; thismeets the basic requirement of WP:PROF.  DGG ( talk ) 07:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment As the person who this article is about, I would not mind at all if it were deleted. Most important reason: everybody will think that I either wrote it myself or asked somebody to write it. I find that rather embarrassing. At least wait till I'm dead, please. ;-) Niki Ritt (talk) 09:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comment and WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.