Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilbach Suchare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 19:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Nilbach Suchare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article we were notified about via OTRS about a purported pseudonym used by writers. Three references and a supposed quote that go nowhere, plus some important-sounding prose that does not support the claims in the article at all. There are also two external links to a book of pseudonyms that do not contain the term (no book does as far as I can tell). The kicker is the last paragraph: The goal behind creating Nilbach Suchare is to demonstrate that the Internet has become a reference for virtually all published material, so the canon no longer exists as a controllable, countable set, but a random, vacillating background, with a reference that also does not support the claim. Web results seem to indicate the term has been used to seed images into Google search. This is not a neologism with widespread use or notability, so I believe we're looking at a hoax. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - It might be somebody's pet project and they are seeding Wikipedia. In any case, it fails verifiability as none of the listed references check out.  there's no page numbers on the book and searching for the phrase in the book finds nothing, nor do my own searches turn up anything useful. -- Whpq (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent hoax. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.