Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilutpalgogoivilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. No salvagable content, and if it is a copyvio, it needs to be deleted quickly. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Nilutpalgogoivilla

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not sure what the title has to do with the subject, but this text is obviously copied from somewhere else. It's also not written in an encyclopedic manner. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Retitle article "Arun Sarma" and add references and cats. It is about a famous Assamese dramatist.S. M. Sullivan (talk) 04:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's also a newspaper interview, with a title derived from the interviewer's name, and an introduction that says outright, in as many words, that it's a firsthand interview. Did you not read the first paragraph of the article? Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance, nor a free wiki hosting service.  (The creator of this article put another interview, since blanked, on the article's talk page, and appears to be under the mistaken impression that Wikipedia is a free publication service for such things.) Uncle G (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 05:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There may be scope for an article on Arun Sarma, but this content is not the start of it. There's no redeemable content here, because this content is an interview, complete with unsourced analysis by the person performing the interview ( &mdash; the "Nilutpal Gogoi" given as a byline in the interview), whose style is simply completely wrong for an encyclopaedia ("one thing is for sure", "fag end of the last millennium", "The best part of this dramatist", "memorable", and more).  Nilutpal Gogoi, you have come to the wrong place.  Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia.  It's not a venue for getting onesself and one's firsthand research into print.  It is not a free wiki hosting service.  Please get your magazine/newspaper article interviews published in the proper outlets for such things.  Uncle G (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Speedy - obvious copyvio from something. Hipocrite (talk) 20:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Sandor Clegane (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since it is currently impossible to decipher what the subject of the article is, especially since it contains no sources. If can clarify that and produce relevant sources, then we can re-evaluate and recreate/rewrite the article. Abecedare (talk) 06:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't even understand it. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure it's a copyvio, but it does seem to be badly translated. Googling long sentences comes up with no hits, but googling short statistically improbable phrases like "adjudged the best" and "fag end of the last millennium" turns up mostly sites in India. Perhaps this article just needs to be re-written better. Soap Talk/Contributions 23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - something quicker than speedy! Jenuk1985  |  Talk  23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.