Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nima Soltani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  01:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Nima Soltani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking ghits and Gnews of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. red dog six (talk) 04:35, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I am compiling a few new sources I have found. The big thing is the subject area - Persian Carpets is such a niche area and so few people make the carpets/fix them anymore most of the major "carpet fixers" would in fact be notable in their main industry. I am reserving vote at the moment until I fully establish an opinion. 7 days gives me the time to do the background work and make an informed vote.Boatingfaster (talk) 05:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks like paid-editing spam; no evidence of WP:BIO notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * CLOSING ADMIN - Note that Boatingfaster is a sockpuppet of a paid editor: here PeterWesco (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE PeterWesco (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing found to indicate the notability that would make an encyclopedia article appropriate. --Michig (talk) 07:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.