Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimble Quest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (Nomination withdrawn.) czar   &middot;   &middot;  07:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Nimble Quest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Article about a mobile game that fails to meet WP:PRODUCT. The article was created the same day it was released, and thus has little to none independent third-party coverage that could help establish notability. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - It was just released yesterday. It's not notable yet, and may never be. I found no reliable sources that have reported on this game. The only sources that I found were minor blogs and advertising web sites that are not independent of the subject. Fails WP:NSOFTWARE and WP:NVG. - MrX 18:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - RE: notability, resources: The game has been covered by many major mobile gaming review sites, including but not limited to Kotaku, TouchArcade , and Gamezebo . The developers have gone viral before from their letter to major gaming company Zynga . There is also controversy surrounding this game that should be added into the article regarding its similarity to the mobile game Call of Snakes. The game was just released this Wednesday, but the beta has been out for long enough for all the information in the article to be in general circulation, and was available to play on TouchArcade's website . Kamirose (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

==Notes== 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme ( talk )  00:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG from the sources provided by Kamirose, some of them are listed as reliable by Wikiproject Video games, and you have Forbes. Diego (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdraw It's fairly obvious that this has now become notable. I thank the editors who updated the article with additional sources and material. If anyone wants to close this as Keep, go ahead. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.