Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimrod de Rosario


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR.  So Why  09:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Nimrod de Rosario

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject not notable enough to warrant their own page Contaldo80 (talk) 12:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - notable subject in the field and is prominent figure in Argentina. Claíomh Solais (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are hardly any reliable supporting references, and none demonstrate widespread or mainstream notability of the subject. Certainly nothing to suggest the prominence of the individual in Argentina. No media coverage for example. He is not an academic and his writings are fringe (dealing with "hidden" knowledge etc). Contaldo80 (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Struck duplicate !vote from nominator; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America1000 19:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that the nominator and the delete !voter are the same editor.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 05:23, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I found only one source from Bolivia which does not confer notability. L3X1 (distænt write)  02:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  So  Why  07:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.