Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina's Hair Parlour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, almost snow keep. Even if DumbBOT completed this AfD only yesterday, the third-party coverage is so significant that anything but keeping is unlikely. – sgeureka t•c 14:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Nina's Hair Parlour

 * } ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I found this just a few minutes ago and thought that this article should be deleted because its non-noticable and its just a load of garbage.--Pookeo9 (talk) 19:53, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment "A load of garbage" is not a deletion reason. Does it breach any Wikipedia policy? For the record, I've declined a speedy request on this one as the Guardian article and Celebrity Scissorhands appearance seem enough of an assertion of notability ; I know nothing about hairdressing so have no opinion on the viability of the article . –  iride scent  00:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. On doing some checking, this appears to be a genuine notable institution in its (somewhat specialist) field; the fact that it warranted a fairly lengthy article in a major newspaper is enough to convince me. –  iride scent  20:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Added a couple more references including features on the shop from Vogue and The Times. IMO this is clearly notable no matter how many Twinkle-armed taggers deem it otherwise. –  iride scent  00:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems quite notable, per Iridescent. -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 05:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Obviously. A very famous place, certainly the most renowned hairdressing parlour in the UK if not among one of the most famous in the world. In fact, the staff are becoming so well known that they'll probably warrant their own pages soon. There was a huge article on barber Mark McCarthy in Bizarre magazine last year. Tris2000 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Oh one thing that should be changed, though: remove the hyperlink to the parlour's website at the start of the article, and include it in an External Links section. Tris2000 (talk) 16:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources exist to establish notability (in spades) -- Whpq (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not only are there sufficient sources, the very first sentence in the article establishes notability on the spot. - Mgm|(talk) 00:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.