Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Flohr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Nina Flohr

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails GNG. Coverage is all (announcement from press releases?) of a resort yet to be built, an Observatory yet to observe. Past 10 years' career not notable. Revealing a stylishly jet set life is not notability, IMHO. Significant coverage of philanthropy not present. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  08:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Founding a yet-to-open eco-resort and being engaged to the Prince are hardly notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. No better sourcing found. Edwardx (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and other relevant notability criteria.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 11:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: I'm the editor. The eco-resort while not open, is constructed - and it's unique sustainable production has been featured in titles like the FT, NY Times and The Architects Newspaper (all cited). The Ocean Observatory has "observed", there are two research papers cited, including PNAS, which is one of the most referenced scientific publications, internationally. It is the first long-term African Ocean Observatory monitoring multiple ecosystems for climate change - which is philanthropic. Her marriage to a Prince follows existing wiki pages like Princess Mary of Denmark - who had no career or notoriety pre wedding. I previously created a page for designer Christoper Raeburn who had none of the notoriety or substantial coverage, yet received no objection from Wiki. (He now is very well know, also for sustainability). I respect the process. Edianne32 (talk) 18:41, 1 December 2020 (AEST)
 * Keep: Nina Flohr has a rich history and concur that her appointment to become part of the Greek royal family poses a strong case for her to have visibility to the public. Her philanthropic works should be noted and publicised. GRob89 (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2020 (AEST)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.