Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Macc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Nina Macc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just some D-list Nicky Minaj clone. Zero mentions in reliable sources, no charting songs, thus fails WP:NMUSIC Tarc (talk) 06:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This user Tarc is trolling and disrespecting a artist. Don't delete. User:Baphomet_Dynasty


 * Delete. Nothing on the article constitutes a RS. Can't find anything either. Fails WP:BAND. Cannolis (talk) 07:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't delete. "Just some D-list Nicky Minaj clone." is not a good reason to delete this artist's article. This rapper has worked with some big names such as Shade Sheist and Philthy Rich and is gaining exposure through YouTube.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:50C1:CE00:2993:F4FA:D64B:E2E4 (talk) 10:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * — 2606:6000:50C1:CE00:2993:F4FA:D64B:E2E4 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Then it is Too soon if she is just gaining exposure. Cannolis (talk) 12:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Don't delete. Nina Macc is CEO of a label. She already has millions of views on YouTube and made a name for herself. Nina Macc is not a Nicki Minaj clone. She is her own recognized artist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariana Grande adorer (talk • contribs) 12:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)  : — Ariana Grande adorer (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Strike vote by confirmed sockpuppet.


 * Comment - Note that while a lot of details and such were expanded by IPs overnight, all of it is speaks of the famous people this person has worked with and the links to her songs on itunes, none of which meet WP:N. And no, "a million youtube views" isn't a yardstick that the Wikipedia uses. Tarc (talk) 13:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - This artist can be found in the public ACE database provided by The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers and she has a number of registered compositions, some of which show evidence of placement on major syndicated television shows such as "Graceland" on The USA Network and other MTV Networks related broadcasting. Her music is being aired on National FM radio in the United States which can be reviewed using the Neilsen Broadcasting Database System. Charting is not required for an artist to have an article on Wikipedia thus should not be considered a factor for deletion. The commentors in this deletion request clearly write with an overtone of a personal dislike for the artist, which is not grounds for legitimate deletion. (Nmgemg) 15:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC) — Nmgemg (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * You have a lack of understanding of what it means to be notable in terms of this project's policies and guidelines. Being notable doesn't just mean "I have seen this artist on tv and heard her on the radio; notability is established for a musician when multiple reliable, secondary sources cover the subject in-depth (WP:RSis also worth a read).  There is also a secondary notability criteria for musicians, WP:NMUSIC, where yes, one of the possible criteria is a charting single.  I have no personal dislike for the subject herself; I am disdainful of people who create articles on clearly minor celebrities. Tarc (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - clearly does not meet the notability guidelines.Onel5969 (talk) 12:41, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has zero reliable sources and attempts to assert notability by using iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, YouTube, etc., as references. No evidence of meeting WP:ANYBIO. -- Kinu  t/c 13:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.