Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Marker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Nina Marker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only reference actually bout her is the Okwudu write-up in Vogue, and that's not enough .Otherwise, it's just placement on lists, and the existence of photos in magazines.  DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration.  Lubbad85   (☎) 00:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Yet again, I have to explain common sense. The "existence of photos in magazines" isn't there to look cute, it's the verification of work by reliable sources. God, what happened to reading comprehension? The only list there is by models.com; when they place a model on their "Hot List" (they pointed out at 7 notable jobs including Chanel, Versace, Vogue Italia etc. that got her on that radar) that means the model has had a successful breakout and they expect them to move (or graduate, in their words) to the "Top 50 Models", on top of already being one of their "Top Newcomers" because she made maximum impact on the premium runways of Fenty, Coach, J.W. Anderson, Fendi, Versace, Saint Laurent and Givenchy. Needless to say, Nina is so on the rise. Elite Model Look gives more than enough detail about her career so far, it's practically a Wikipedia article itself. When Vogue has on multiple occasions that said she is a top model, successful in couture, and one the biggest breakouts she must be doing something right. But wait, if she were dating a famous actor and had a famous "step-dad" people would be willing to overlook such "deficiencies" conveniently. At least this model has a career to speak of. Trillfendi (talk) 19:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Trillfendi is correct that the subject is notable. I had to research to see that she was not only notable for being a model and having Aspergers: she is actually notable for her modeling work. She passes GNG: She has featured articles about her in major publications. Her appearance on the hot list speaks to the fact that she has arrived. And she is not just the model du jour ...but even if she was, once notable always notable. The subject has been featured in vogue. And again in vogue as a Breakout Model. And her various cover photos. This subject easily passes GNG.   Lubbad85   (☎) 00:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. Agree with the above - coverage is non-trivial and discusses the subject, so passes WP:GNG.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novabrahm (talk • contribs) 03:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with the above - coverage is non-trivial and discusses the subject, so passes WP:GNG.  WP:Not paper.  Her work is itself evidence of notability. See WP:Actor. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 11:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep https://www.vogue.com/article/nina-marker-versace-model-on-fashion-autism-awareness is significant coverage clearly. https://www.popsugar.co.uk/fashion/Nina-Marker-Funny-Model-Instagram-43367448 mentions how funny she is on Instagram.  Got things written about her in various places other than just brief mentions of her modeling.   D r e a m Focus  16:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.