Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Prinz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 05:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Nina Prinz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Individual exists and races motorcycles-- this does not equate to notability. Subject has not won any significant competitive races nor received other recognition in the forms of awards or medals nor does she appear to have been the subject of non-trivial coverage in reliable independent sources. KDS 4444 Talk  05:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Likely Keep: She appears to meet requirements for WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:NMOTORSPORT (#1 & #3) given the larger (but unsourced) list at de:Nina Prinz (eg: she was 2007 and 2008 European Women's 1000cc Champion), and the coverage shown at GNews, for instance Moto2 wild card, and member of the first mixed-gender team to win a round in FIM Endurance racing. undefinedHydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)  13:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hmmmm... Maybe so.  But I am concerned that the German Wikipedia article also has not a single reference in it to substantiate any of these claims, and the only award she appears to have won for a notable bike race is for the ADAC Junior Cup, for which she got 21st place (according to the German Wikipedia).  We still don't have a single, reliable, independent, verifiable source covering her non-trivially in either English or German yet, do we?   KDS 4444  Talk  21:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 13:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.