Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Staehli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Nina Staehli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NARTIST. Despite 34 references, I see very little substantial coverage apart, perhaps, from one article on swissart.ch.

The article has been created and maintained by the subject and appears to serve no other purpose than self-promotion. Rentier (talk) 19:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  20:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: Staehli is listed in SIKART with a documentation level of 2 out of 5, indicating low notability. The scant literature noted there also doesn't give me much hope that there is enough her for an article.  Sandstein   09:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 02:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously an autobio. I initially had hope for the article, but after trimming many CV entries, I went on a reference earch and came up with nothing in Google books. The article references are mostly passing mentions. If you've been an artist for a decade it is not unreasonable to expect that there would be a few decent in-depth articles on your work. Fails GNG and WP:ARTIST.198.58.171.47 (talk) 06:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet notability guidelines for artists. Wikipedia is not a venue for self-promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.