Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Teicholz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article eligible for g5 speedy deletion as creation by blocked or banned user. (non-admin closure) ☆ Bri (talk) 03:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Nina Teicholz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not establish general notability or biographical notability because it does not address in-depth coverage by third parties. It has two main problems, marginal notability, and conflict of interest. If all of the conflicted editing (by the author and her sockpuppets) were removed, very little would be left, so see TNT. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, basically WP:BLP1E in respect of one book that was briefly popular. Relentless PR spamming puts this in the "not worth the trouble" category IMO. Guy (Help!) 00:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Article subject fails WP:NAUTHOR, as information about Teicholz is almost exclusively related to her book. As such, WP:SIGCOV about Teicholz herself is limited. This is in addition to the conflicts of interest and paid editing that surrounds this article, per .--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Strictly speaking the COI aspects do not affect notability. The point is that the subject fails to pass even the unconscionably permissive standards of WP:NAUTHOR. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.