Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja-Blade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ninja-Blade

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The creator even says "No release date or any other information has been released yet". Cunard (talk) 01:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete crystalballery. JuJube (talk) 02:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Horselover Frost (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL Schuym1 (talk) 21:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

*Delete — Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. MuZemike (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Basement12 (T.C) 00:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - just noticed Ninja Blade. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Article WP:PRODded. MuZemike (talk) 01:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Why must the article should be deleted when the game is official confirmed?. --SkyWalker (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Gametrailers is not considered a verifable source as far as video games are concerned. See WP:VG/S as well as the tirade at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 52. MuZemike (talk) 04:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was not talking about Gametrailers. I was talking about this, this and this.--SkyWalker (talk) 07:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:SOFIXIT. Add them into the article. MuZemike (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Remain at delete — The new sources seem to indicate that this is not crystalballing. However, said sources only provide trivial coverage at best and, in my view, does not meet the general notability guideline, so I cannot vouch to keep the article as a result. MuZemike (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.