Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja presence in Myanmar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Ninja presence in Myanmar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Same reasons as for Articles for deletion/Ninja presence in Russia. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Japan,  and Myanmar. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. From the time of its creation, the article's lede has read: "Despite the fact that there is no evidence of traditional ninja existence in Burma...." and the remainder is mostly related to two people who have been described as quote "the last ninja" unquote, which is more a turn of phrase than a serious claim that there were ninjas in World War II Japan or that they exist in Japan today. Dekimasu よ! 02:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Using the same approach as went into creating this we might equally create “Ninjas on the Titanic”, “Ninjas in Portland, Oregon” or any number of similar non topics. Mccapra (talk) 03:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Dekimasu and Mccapra. Just a jumble of information with tenuous links pretending to be an article. JML1148 (talk &#124; contribs) 07:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, same as the "ninjas in Russia" article. Bad OR and synthesis of other facts. Oaktree b (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Incoherent topic, seemingly just random references to vaguely related concepts. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. If anything this should be a subsection of another article or the information should get distributed to relevant articles  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 13:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.