Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja the Mission Force


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As always thanks for improving the article & finding sources. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Ninja the Mission Force

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No secondary sourcing, just press releases and non-notable awards. The inclusion of Brad Jones and his crew does not give this one inherent notability. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - non-notable . Editor located additional sources.DangerDogWest (talk) 06:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep meets WP:N. My own due diligence found decent reviews in DVD Talk and in DVD Verdict as well as Den of Geek and Tubefilter, and there's more. Plenty enough to improve an existing article. Will do so after work tomorrow.   Schmidt,   Michael Q. 06:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * So what are you going to do, expect the sources to put themselves in the article? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I sure wouldn't expect the person who nominates if for deletion to perform WP:SEP or make any improvements himself (chuckle), but I found and offered sources and under WP:N, notability for the topic is established even if the article needs work. And had you read all of my "keep" you might have also read of my intent to work on it tonight (sheesh). Perhaps you're surprised that I have jobs that do not permit employees to edit Wikipedia while on-the-clock. And after spending nearly three hours on highway is some incredibly nasty traffic, I'm finally home (whew). Thanks though for the smile.  Time now for some WP:ITJ.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Some work done. Anyone who wishes to or has the time may join in.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per Schmidt's sources above. Cavarrone 19:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear and convincing secondary source coverage, as ably described, above. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 23:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.