Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ninoy Aquino International Airport. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 03:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 1

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable independently from Ninoy Aquino International Airport. Redirect to Ninoy Aquino International Airport (nothing to merge as all of it is unsourced). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Delete or redirect? Take my opinion as redirect.
 * Redirect - Per nom. Class 455  ( talk |stand clear of the doors!)  17:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Delete. No reason to set this terminal apart from the airport.Glendoremus (talk) 05:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a large important building and so it could have an article, but Ninoy Aquino International Airport already covers the entity in detail -- and is sourced, unlike this article. Nothing to merge, as there're no sources. Redirect if you want, but the argument against a redirect is that redirects are use partly to aid searching, and having two links that come up when the reader begins to type "Ninoy Aquino Internati..." in the search box is possibly confusing. Herostratus (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per . FWIW, I've been there. No big whoop. Bearian (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  00:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
 * Redirect - An average of 12 page views per day in the life of the article is enough for me. Timothy Joseph Wood  14:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  01:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Described in detail in main article. --stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 12:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect, for the reasons noted above (unsourced and not independently notable). I actually would prefer to "delete", because a redirect seems a bit silly (one has to type the name of the target article in the Search box before one can type the name of the instant article, so what's the point?).  But, I'll 'go with the flow' here and call for a redirect.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.