Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo DS launch titles

Nintendo DS launch titles
The list has been merged back into the main article Nintendo DS, and this article is hardly worth an entry by itself, instead it is better as part of the main Nintendo DS article. 132.205.15.43 02:56, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * anons are not allowed to nominate VfD. &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:32, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Policy page does not ban anons from nominating VFDs. This attitude towards anon users as a categorical denial of existence is a very biased stance, showing none of the impartiality and fair judgment that policy requires of admins. It's an elitist and exclusionary attitude. If anons can CREATE and MODIFY articles, then there is no reason why anons cannot nominate to delete articles. I'm sure you'd just as happily ban non-registered users from modifying or creating articles, considering this stance. Ofcourse having a username means nothing, in relation to the appropriateness of comments or actions. 132.205.45.148 15:19, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * RaD Man, where does it say that anons are not allowed to make VFD nominations? Paul August &#9742; 05:03, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep as a redirect. - SimonP 03:12, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anybody searching for Nintendo DS launch titles will get Nintendo DS in the search results. utcursch 08:59, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. ditto. Mdchachi|Talk 19:24, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep content. Merge and redirect as appropriate to Nintendo DS.  Article already contains the appropriate merge tag.  &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 09:32, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * someone already merged it, see the history on Nintendo DS 132.205.45.148 15:53, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * If the merge has already been done, delete and remove the link on Nintendo DS. - Andre Engels 10:26, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is this or isn't this still a VfD? RaD Man declared it invalid and removed its deletion notice, yet he voted at the same time and Andre voted later.  Having valid users vote delete would seem to be a renomination.  Mrwojo 20:27, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 08:32, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)