Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo Power V1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 01:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Nintendo Power V1

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An individual issue of a magazine which fails notability standards. Perhaps some information can be merged to the larger Nintendo Power article. -- Merope 02:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete yes, it's definitely not notable, we do not need different articles for each issue of a magazine anger2headshot 03:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete agreedBalloonman 04:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 13:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, very few individual magazines are noteworthy enough, such as Superman's first appearance, but this one's not nearly up to par. Useight 19:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because an individual issue rarely ever holds notability. Anything significant about the first issue should be attributed at Nintendo Power, and if there is overwhelmingly significant real-world context for the issue, then perhaps a content fork can be explored.  However, it needs to start at Nintendo Power and not be here as an underdeveloped stub. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The magazine hasn't inspired widespread discussion of analysts of the video game industry or fan communities, nor are there any special editions or any interesting incidents related to it. Hence it's not notable.--Kylohk 22:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (Merge with Nintendo Power if there is anything unique to this article). Chief claim of notability is likely simply because it's "the first" one--which is really a claim of the notability of the entire series. --Cheers, Komdori 22:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.