Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo Style Guide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  05:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Nintendo Style Guide

 * — (View AfD)

Try as I may, I cannot figure out how this is encyclopedic. Stifle (talk) 22:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Ditto. -- Kicking222 23:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I question that this even EXISTS. -Amarkov blahedits 23:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It does indeed exist, though I'm not certain if it's something they created exclusively for that event (I don't have a login to the NOA press site to check). It was available at E3 as stated, and since they had a guest login enabled at that time, it was simple to get the document back then. --Pidgeot (t) (c) (e) 23:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Nqomc 01:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. --- RockMFR 07:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 21:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this isn't an encyclopedic article - it's instructions for Nintendo's PR department. This doesn't even belong on a gaming wiki, much less an encyclopedia. Koweja 08:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-encylopedic. --Scottie theNerd 13:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete:All it effectivly does is say the names of nintendo's consoles, definately non-encyclopedic Da Big Bozz 17:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete —Tokek 13:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is indeed a real PR document, and as such, might be appropriate for Wikisource (if sourced).  However, it doesn't establish notability, and as such doesn't seem appropriate for Wikipedia. --Alan Au 19:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.