Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nip 'N Tang® Fruited Horseradish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Nip 'N Tang® Fruited Horseradish
A vanity page for a food item, apparently featured in the New York Times. Contested prod, brought here for your viewing pleasure. Grand master  ka  14:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant ad. CLW 14:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * SAVE It's a world-brand that has the gourmet food industry all aflutter - shouldn't it be defined here? —This unsigned comment was added by 70.201.3.0 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete per nom. --Khoikhoi 23:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, complete advert. And nasty sounding.  Kuru   talk  23:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. I remain un-afluttered. Fishhead64 05:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even the keep comment in here was an ad... -- Rory 0 96 07:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, blatant, shameless advertising. J I P  | Talk 08:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advert for what sounds like an absolutely disgusting product? This isn't "Two great tastes that taste great together".--Isotope23 20:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.