Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nipun Jaswal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Nipun Jaswal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable researcher or author, lacks in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. A Google news search for "Nipun Jaswal" or "निपुण जस्वाल" return nothing. If someone could prove that the award is significant to establish notability, I may change my mind. The award of excellence is most certainly not significant enough for inclusion, in my opinion. GSS (talk |c|em ) 08:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 08:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 08:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 08:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi GSS, He has got a National award from National Cyber Safety & Security Standards, a joint initiative by National Cyber Safety and MSMEDI,Ministry of MSME, Government of India. The excellence award is very rare. Moreover there are paragraph description about him in the provided news references which are national dailies. BetterSmile:D 09:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)

Keep Notable author with 4 books and have many citations on research papers from IEEE, Research gate and references from other notable cyber security books which adhere to #2 WP:AUTHORRafiq Marbaros (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC) — Rafiqmarbaros (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Author of 4 non-notable books how it passes WP:NAUTHOR? There is no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources to support WP:GNG either. GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Dear GSS bro when i did a check at citations of the book, apart from listing and reviews at google books, i found references at researchgate and IEEE at published papers. I may be wrong about WP:AUTHOR, sorry about that brother. Rafiq Marbaros (talk) 04:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This was your second edit after registration so I would like to suggest please read WP:RS, WP:GNG and notability guidelines carefully before voting in AfD's or anywhere else. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage except few mentions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. --Elton-Rodrigues 15:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep More reliable references seen. Amar Ujala is a leading Newspaper in India. Passes WP:GNG and additionally it also passed WP:AUTHOR mainly 2,3 and 4th point of WP:AUTHOR . passes 2 - He is known for originating new concept WFF. passes 3 - He has created and co-created books that had various editions. passes 4 - He has got National award in his field of activity considering all his contributions BetterSmile:D 17:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC) .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)  — Note to closing admin: Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * The sources incliding Amar Ujala failed to establish notability and many of them are not even reliable. I don't understand on what basis you claim it passes WP:AUTHOR do you have any evidence? GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * comment There is no basis for saying Amar Ujala article failed to establish notability . It very well features the person. Moreover I have mentioned above why he passes WP:NAUTHOR. He is also seen in WorldCat, which is well enough to prove the notability BetterSmile:D 03:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)
 * comment An additional article from Hindustan (newspaper) also added to enhance WP:GNG BetterSmile:D 03:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)
 * WorldCat has nothing to do with notability and I still can't see a single evidence to support WP:AUTHOR. Your link to Hindustan is not working. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * comment FYI WorldCat is the World's Largest Library Catalog . In the criteria for notability notability it is stated that for any biography,if the person has an entry in the library, Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication is notable.WorldCat being the World's Largest Library Catalog has him listed in it. Along with other criterion here is this added criterion which proves his notability BetterSmile:D 13:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)
 * Really? WorldCat is not a citation source; it's a library holdings catalog. It verifies existence, not "coverage" or notability, or anything else. Being listed in WorldCat really is rather meaningless when assessing notability and WorldCat lists anything that is published. GSS (talk |c|em ) 13:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment An additional article from Ajit (newspaper) added along with more content towards notability BetterSmile:D 16:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettersmiley (talk • contribs)
 * Primary sources are not enough to meet the Wikipedia's notability guidelines. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete- The subject in question is non-notable and fails WP:AUTHOR, Quantity of books written don't count for notability, I cant see any in depth coverage in the mainstream media about him or his work.  FITINDIA   18:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  17:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Duck alert

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  11:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.