Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirav Tripathi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Nirav Tripathi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vanity piece a non-notable individual. Available sources do not indicate WP:SIGCOV in reliable third-party sources, and therefore the subject of the article does not cross the notability threshold as provided under WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Analysis of sources: The small article in the Newscorp-owned Sunshine Coast Daily extensively quotes the subject of the article, and therefore it cannot be called a "third party" source &mdash;. Another article in The Courier-Mail, a Brisbane-based tabloid owned by Newscorp, also quotes the subject extensively leaving very little substance to the article that may be truly called "third-party" or "independent of the subject" so as to fall under WP:SIGCOV &mdash;. Please note that both publications are from the same publishing organization &mdash; Newscorp. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  20:01, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - overly promotional and no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 08:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, he's not really notable in his own right - rather only through business connections. Bearian (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.