Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirnnayakam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. The nominator has been indefinitely blocked as a sock, and no formal !votes are present in the discussion. The notions of renaming the article, etc. can continue to be discussed on the article talk page, if desired. North America1000 17:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Nirnnayakam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a 2015 film article created with the wrong name spelling and there are no sources at all. Another article with the correct name was created unknowingly (by me) Nirnaayakam which had all reliable supporting sources and external link. So i suggest either do delete this page or to move/merge to the later. Recommending to delete as no use with moving. VagaboundWind (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Nirnaayakam Nirnnayakam Nirnayakam
 * WP:INDAFD: Nirnaayakam Nirnnayakam Nirnayakam
 * WP:INDAFD: Nirnaayakam Nirnnayakam Nirnayakam

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment In the Anglifying of many Indian film titles, occurrences of double-vowels and double-consonants are common. As spellings Nirnnayakam (double-N) and Nirnaayakam] (double-A) are both sourcable, We need input from Indian Wikipedians and keep the one that those-in-the-know agree with.
 * However it may perhaps be best to delete the double-N and move the double-A latter to the sourcable title which does NOT use double letters... Nirnayakam  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: the nominator has been indefinitely blocked as a block-evading sockpuppet and the article they created about this film has been deleted under WP:CSD. I don't see any point in deleting this now as it's no longer a duplicate article, although we could still move it if desired.  Hut 8.5  21:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck the nomination, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 17:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.