Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nischal (actor) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Nischal (actor)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Certainly time for another AfD since 2008 considering Wikipedia has changed since then and I believe I myself would've frankly suggested delete at the first AfD, as my searches have found only happenstance coverage at News, browsers, Highbeam and WP:INDAFD, nothing actually suggesting any better solid notability for Wikipedia aside from the usual expected Indian gossip news. For convenience, I'm notifying the only still active 1st AfDers and  to let them know about this new AfD. SwisterTwister  talk  23:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * looking beyond:
 * type:
 * alt name:
 * complete:
 * just last:
 * WP:INDAFD: Nischal child Nischal Nishal Chandra Master Nishal
 * In October 2008 - No consensus
 * In November 2008 - keep

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and re-title Nishal Chandra as the fellow has coverage under his full adult name even if not so much as a child actor, when his adult issues receive coverage. Since a person may leave acting and pursue a regular life, we need not continue judging him only as a prolific child actor under WP:ENT and can add WP:BASIC into the consideration pool. Needs work, not deletion because it has not been improved. WP:NTEMP anyone?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. MichaelQSchmidt's search has found only primary sources, such as news reports about his latest activities, and primary sources don't count toward notability.  We need secondary sources!  It's one thing to assume that there aren't any secondary sources (no retrospective coverage in news media, no appearances in books, academic journals, etc.), because that can easily be disproven with a little work, but MichaelQSchmidt has done the searching and shown that these don't exist.  Nyttend (talk) 02:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment expecting academic journal coverage is raising the bar too high for non- academic subjects. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: This ancient article has been surviving off of a single reference. Unless this article can be repaired in a timely fashion that proves that the subject matter is notable and the subject of significant coverage, I see no reason why it should remain up any longer. D ARTH B OTTO talk•cont 06:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given by myself in the last AFD. Still no proper sourcing. If kept, rename to Nishal Chandra. Stifle (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 00:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage seems to have been really driven by much more notable first wife, notability is not inherited.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.