Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishikant Sadaphule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Nishikant Sadaphule

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor/director. Notability not supported by references, minor awards, lots of name droppings not much more. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  18:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:GNG due to the lack of reliable secondary sources independent of the subject (the two sources in the article are by the actor itself). Doing some searches, there are almost no reliable sources reporting on the subject. Esquivalience t 05:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -Okay, created by a SPA, there are some extra-ordinary claims made in the article that suggest subject being a notable person but on the ground level, we do not see any such sources and all those claims fail Wikipedia's core content policies such as WP:Verifiability. Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:FILMMAKER. They are said to "produce" an award winning film, but that really is not a valid criteria. I think, creator has called them a director for making advertisement films. However, Filmfare nomination for the music of film Aboli, if sourced to a reliable source may get them on board, -per WP:MUSICBIO #8 and if it was true, they were supposed to meet the GNG standard too (you know, Indian media?). Again, there are no reliable sources to verify extra-ordinary claims made in the article and subject fails to meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards. I do not know their local Marathi language, therefore unable to help if there any such sources exists (have tried for English and Hindi languages, found none). Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  22:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.