Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishkarsh Kulshrestha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Nishkarsh Kulshrestha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Autobiography of a young actor who has had minor parts in a couple of TV series - he clearly does not meet WP:NACTOR, and so it is WP:TOOSOON for an article. I have not been able to find sources that would meet WP:GNG, and the only source in the article just barely passes as a source and does not show any notability. bonadea contributions talk 11:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This was BLPPRODed and a source (albeit not the best source) was provided but the PROD was removed and could/should have been deleted by this as my first searches instantly found nothing good and there's not even an IMDb. It'd be nice if Wiki included every single actor but this looks a like personal webpage and there's not much foreseeable improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  05:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Not sure but leaning toward Weak Delete. This is an autobiography, which is a violation of policy per Conflict of Interest. However, the auto-bio tag is less than a month old, and so we should give editors some time to improve it. However, if changes are made by the end of the month (or sooner), I would keep the article. Unfortunetly, given the current state of the article, I doubt the issues will be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk • contribs) 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Comprehensively fails to pass any of the criteria at Notability (people). A one-year-old career consisting of alleged bit parts in two television shows, for which there is no available verification. I could find nothing about this person except self-authored social media sites. Voceditenore (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.