Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nissin Kogyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Nissin Kogyo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability--speedy was declined because of association with Autoliv. As that company does not seem notable, I don't consider it a valid reason for declining the A7. ``  DGG ( talk ) 14:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a very respected company and very well known in the motorcycle world and comparable to Brembo. This company has been mentioned and highly regarded in numerous motorcycle reviews online and in print in magazines and books such as here, ,,, , , , , , ,. This company also has significance as a large corp and partner of Autoliv the world's largest automotive safety supplier. How is the world's largest automotive safety supplier not notable? What are you using to gauge that this article should be deleted? There are two editors on the article talk page and a admin so three in total that have assessed that the article should not be deleted so there is no consensus for deletion. -72bikers (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep -- appears to pass WP:ORG as a large corporation (trading on the first tier of the Tokyo Stock Exchange) with subsidiary companies in several countries. The subsidiaries have regional coverage. Its a Japanese company founded in 1953, so I expect that there is also significant coverage in offline foreign language sources. — Cactus Writer (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.