Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niteen Dedhia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject is not sufficiently notable for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Niteen Dedhia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An eye surgeon who has attended conferences, gives tips on eye care and has been involved in unfortunate litigation. None of this adds up to notability. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 08:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The only relevant reference in the article is the one about litigation. However, this more positive story about him curing a blind child could be added. Are those two references enough for WP:GNG? I'm leaning toward "no" but it's close. Pichpich (talk) 19:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't look like notability to me. The girl who is the subject of the article might be, but thousands of doctors routinely perform many hundreds of thousands of cataract operations every year. Happening to be mentioned in a "good-news" story doesn't add up to notability in my book.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete He is a non-notable ophthamologist. My uncle who is an ophthamologist connected with Emory University is probably more notable, but no where near notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I would've also pursued PROD but given the past speedy deletion too, we will likely need G4, not all acceptable for any minimal notability here. Certainly nothing applicably convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG and no claim of notability. On a different note, I am inclined to say that someone was trying to settle some scores with her. The article creator has less than 20 edits and this is the only page he created. In anycase, lets get rid of this article. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  02:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.