Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithra Apps


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Nithra Apps

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable company. Many sources cited in the article don't actually mention it. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and India. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Please let me know what I can do to make my article better. Mpromax (talk) 06:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Lack of notability can't be fixed by any amount of editing, so I'd recommend deleting the article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The topic of discussion is Nithra Apps, a start-up company about which I plan to write an article.
 * Please advise what area I could improve. Mpromax (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Buidhe,
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for you. Mpromax (talk) 11:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: I was unable to find any SIGCOV. Some database sources (e.g., ), but nothing that would establish notability. HouseBlastertalk 16:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed the SIGCOV sourceMpromax (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Mpromax, SIGCOV is a good thing. Articles need SIGCOV to be included in the encyclopedia. HouseBlastertalk 14:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment – I'm not sure they really get what the purpose of an AfD is? See our interactions on my talk page. They seem to think that the article meets NCORP, but other than just saying that they haven't really addressed anyone's concerns really? Sources not even mentioning the subject concerns me. They also didn't confirm nor deny when I asked them if it was possible they were a paid editor... I'm not incredibly familiar with what UPE looks like, but I would think the average person would say something along the lines of "no, I'm not being paid for my edits"? Clover moss  (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * They also--what I can only describe as--sneakily removed the article from the AfD category, which is not something a new user would know how to do, nor would have any reason to do. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 10:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * And they did it again. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 12:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: advertising. . . Mean as custard (talk) 21:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Mean as custard,
 * The article was edited and removed the promotional advertising content Mpromax (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for you. Mpromax (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as a run-of-the-mill startup advertising and COI (probably UPE). Clearly the author is only here to promote the company and not to build the rest of the encyclopedia. Despite requests to disclose COI, they have not, but it's obvious they are involved and approaching this as PR. Regardless of sources in the article, it would have to be completely rewritten, so there is no point in making it a draft either. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 12:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for youMpromax (talk) 11:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As stated above: "Lack of notability can't be fixed by any amount of editing". None of the sources pass the WP:GNG requirements. Without independent reliable in-depth sources, the article can never be anything other than promotional. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 12:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for youMpromax (talk) 12:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for you and I added some reliable independent sourcesMpromax (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The new sources are a private inaccessible workspace, newspaper from 1915, a copy of app store listing, basically an ad for an app, and an app store link. Nothing even close to WP:GNG sources. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 21:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I've just modified and revised my article. I hope my changes make the information more balanced for you and I added some reliable independent sources Mpromax (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage found in any of the sources. 0x Deadbeef 11:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and lacks sigcov.Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.