Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithya (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Gautham Menon. Spartaz Humbug! 08:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Nithya (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The film is yet to be finalised. Also meets WP:CRYSTAL Commander  (Ping Me) 08:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Films that are in pre-production should not have their own articles per WP:NFF.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep IT. Film is set to go on floors on 29th August. Chech the news here(a reliable source). Karthik Nadar (talk) 12:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * "Hit the floors"? Does that mean that filming will start on that day?  I'd draw your attention to WP:NFF which states:  "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles".  Also there are general notability concerns here - if filming is proven to have commenced, this doesn't automatically mean that notability has been met.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Photoshoot was held, film set to go on floors from 5th sept, so no need to merge or delete it now - Behindwoods. Karthik Nadar (talk) 06:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Meets WP:NFF. There hasn't been any official announcement yet, not even the film's title is confirmed as such! Johannes003 (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect The guideline WP:NFF does not require nor demand deletion, and acts only to instruct when certain projects may not be ready for a separate article. If a planned film is getting press but is not quite ready for its own article, policy suggests we can speak about the topic, but in a spot where it might be spoken of in context... like at the director's article at Gautham Menon  As for "Gautham Menon-Jeeva's Nithya to be launched on Aug 29" what "launch" usually means for Indian films is an official blessing and announcement of a film's production... a coming out party, if you might. So no... per guideline no article yet. But yes... per policy, and as pre-production is being written of, we can speak about the project where it best deserves to to be mentioned.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No objection to the suggested redirect here. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No objection from me either, redirecting is also okay. Johannes003 (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect is better option. Karthik Nadar (talk) 09:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No objection from my side. Redirecting would be a better option. -- Commander (Ping Me) 10:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant    talk    00:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect - WP notability guidelines discourage articles on upcoming films, until they are in production. --Noleander (talk) 02:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:ATD. The film has not received enough coverage in the media to warrant an article, but the title would make a good redirect to the director's article. --Odie5533 (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.