Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitroindazole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, for the reasons shown, and for the vast improvement in the article since the nomination. Closed early per WP:SNOW. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Nitroindazole

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete perhaps enough context to gather that this a chemical or drug, but no refs or indication that this is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. It has 5590 Google scholar hits. I spelled out an acronym in the article and left a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology in hopes that someone from that project would have a better idea how to handle this. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has been expanded substantially since the nomination and has several references. --Itub (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Searching PubMed with the MeSH term "7-nitroindazole "[Substance Name] yields 619 citations. Based this PubMed search, the article is clearly notable. Boghog2 (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, discussed in reliable sources and is an inhibitor of a particularly important enzyme. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Clearly worth a Wikipedia article - thanks to Boghog2 and TimVicker for their recent expansion of the article addressing its deficiencies. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but it is beginning to get a little tiresome when the nom could have done the google search himself--and, if one doesnt feel competent to expand, mention the article at the apropriate project.  DGG (talk) 03:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Definite keep - perhaps the only known inhibitor of nNOS of any use experimentally. Snellios (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.