Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article is solely based on author's own research and is not supported by any reliable source. Even the sources which the author has used in this article contradicts his claims for example author has used New History of Marathas Vol2 by Govind Sakharam Sardesai in his article and that book's Pg 85-90 (here is the link for book), says there were two campaigns one from 1725-26 and second from 1726-27 both led by Bajirao called "Bajirao's 1st Carnatic Expedition" and "Bajirao's 2nd Carnatic Expedition" the author simply combined those two conflicts kept a name as per his choice which violates Wikipedia guidelines. Also result section has a problem; the same source stated above gives a Maratha victory see Pg 85, quoting 1727 April: Karnatik Chiefs submit to Bajirao, so Nizam victory is also inappropriate.Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, India, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka,  and Tamil Nadu.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - A separate article is not warranted for this much content. Capitals00 (talk) 02:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above-mentioned comments.Rawn3012 (talk) 04:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Constructive45 (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC) . Blocked sock.  Ratnahastin  (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I see you provided no counter to my comment for which I nominated this article for deletion. I am assuming it's because you simply can't. Also, I see your talk page is full of edit disputes with other users where you are constantly trying to push your narrative. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 03:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Page is WP:SYNTH. So many sources and not a single source helps with verification of the war and the timeline. The page is written with a circular bit of logic. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 14:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.