Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Njedeh Anthony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Njedeh Anthony

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The article creator admits they are being paid by the author and has been creating articles for all the individual books (also not notable) as well as inserting the author's name in lists. ... disco spinster   talk  20:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  20:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I had placed a PROD tag on the article earlier. My rationale was : "No indication that this author meets the requirements of WP:BIO. Furthermore, the author of the article has a blatant WP:COI as he made clear at Draft talk:Njedeh Anthony." Pichpich (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - paid-for spam, nothing found in a search that would indicate WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR could be demonstrated Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. COI here is a major concern especially. A S U K I T E  00:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. nothing to passes notability. fails WP:GNG. GermanKity (talk) 02:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Princess of Ara (talk)  08:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR as did the declined draft. The author has spent days promoting this author and ignoring warnings about COI and disclosing paid editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 11:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely none of the references are reliable or notability-building sources, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to get over WP:GNG on reliable and notability-supporting sources. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which people are automatically entitled to have articles just because they exist — we're an encyclopedia, on which certain specific standards of notability have to be attained, and a certain specific quality and depth of coverage in real reliable sources has to be present to verify the attainment of said standards, for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Disclosed paid editing spam, possibly because the creator thought disclosure was a free pass  dud  hhr  Contribs 20:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Paid editing. Nexus000 (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.